Syllogism in Buddhist Logic
A typical Syllogism in Buddhist Logic would consist of a Subject, a Predicate, a Reason , an Example.
A simple example would be:
Socrates is Mortal. Because he is a Man.
For a Syllogism to be Valid and True, the requirements are as follows:
- The Reason must be equal to the Subject
- The Reason must be equal to the Predicate or be pervaded by the Predicate
- There must be Forward Pervasion: Take Socrates, it follows he is Mortal because he is a Man
- There must be Reverse Pervasion: Take Socrates, it follows he is NOT a Man because he NOT Mortal
Acharya Dharmakirti prescribes status quo of the General Entity and not splitting it into Specific
For Example:
The Valid Syllogism would be: Sound is Impermanent because it is Produced.
An Invalid Syllogism would be: Sound is Impermanent because it is Produced of Sound